Democratic Leadership in Education Assignment Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2750 words

Democratic Leadership in Education - Assignment ExampleThe pay department was considered by many as superfluous to the Agency, but the government was demanding more financial in conformationation, so the Agency was forced to broaden their focus to make a bigger role for financial reporting. level without the Finance Branch, the Agency was able to function in a manner consistent with world-class standards both in its core business and in other areas of its business. In this case, the Agency felt that it would fool do well without the finance department, but it is a subjective and therefore imbalance point of view. The imperative to form a tonic department enhances the function it discharges in this case, financial reporting and management according to the needs and strategies identified by the higher unit (i.e., the government). What the Agency considers its world class performance may nevertheless be in its view, which a balanced financial reporting system using accrual sc ore should provide an impartial view into. Issue Two The existing system had to be upgraded, according to the precedential financial officer, but it would result in a non-standard system. Furthermore, it was perceived as risky due to the particular that so much money had already been spent on the existing system without providing a okay system. Establishing a new system would necessitate new substructures for it to pertain only to the finance department would needs create a system not consistent with the rest of the Agency, but this should not deter the carry on where it is deemed necessary. As Alfred Chandler (1993) put it, a structure must certification strategy, not impede or restrain it. Issue Three The new Finance Director formed a small project group including Mark Black (MIS) and Henry Tell (senior financial officer) to determine requirements for the new financial management system. She to a fault requested funding for the team. Consultants were not used for this asse ssment, but latitude and confidence were given to the existing supply and their technical background, with inputs drawn from key stakeholders through interviews. This appeared to be a wise move. In the development of new structures within an existing organization, it is important to build a sense of legitimacy and acceptance. Bringing in outdoor(a) consultant who hardly knows the Agency would have been a mistake although the resultant system might have been superior, if it were prejudged as unacceptable for being irrelevant, then the new unit may not get the disaster to prove its systems merits and the benefits it may provide the organization. The benefits of taking a structural perspective are that it focuses corporate activity to the specific goals it wishes to achieve, organizes and coordinates the efforts taken towards this effort, and therefore optimizes the firms resources. Resources should be organized to support vital functions, and organizational units seen as superfluou s should be taken out (Lievegoed, 1973). The usefulness of the structural frame, in this case, is to realign roles and responsibilities according to a new (accounting) environment, as well as to transmit facts and information.