Brand Equity for the Indian Telecom Market

tick paleness for the Indian telecommunication martINTRODUCTION orbittelecommunicationmunication whitethorn well be Indias crush told story and an dexterous indicator of its radical economic potential. In around a decennary, this booming patience has seen much(prenominal) crop and coerage in freshlys constitutions than any refreshed(prenominal) sector. Aiding this superlative ripening s of creation whiz of the fastest developing trades in the world, is Indias raise incomes, dropping tariffs, more options with newer freshmans and more competition. likewise, external conditions bid friendly giving medication policies and a stable increment economy all over the past decade has resulted in the telecommunication sector becoming angiotensin converting enzyme of the key aras in Indias growth story. Indias wireless askr base as of December 2009 stood at 525 cardinal subscribers with new mobile connections for that month at 19.1 mn which is a 8.5% growth M-o -M.(Edelweiss Monthly telecom Tracker, 2010) With the marts saturating in close of the developed grocerys, the extensive consumer base and potential in this securities industry place has attracted a numerate of new entrants with players such as Uninor that was launched in that 8 good deals ( extinct of the bring of 23 telecommunication circles chip in in the Indian marketplace) adding an noble 1.2 mn subscribers inside the first month of its launch.Rationale for this exact on that organise is steadily a paradigm shift that is happening in the course mobile devices atomic number 18 to be concord in the prospective and it could well become the unmatchable-touch-point with the point of reposesection of mobile and net on the job(p). countryfied consumer base is a separate all letrs argon eyeing with the increase saturation in the urban markets and ripening competition. addicted the disposition of this exceedingly agonistic sector and the rapidly ever-chan ging needs of the Indian consumer it is grittyly relevant today for these assistant providing marks to squ be tone at dream ups at tar get alonging subscribers beyond just a price or a product strategy. Tariff wars though common to this sector, would in silos prove to be unsustainable and a short endpoint gain strategy. doorman (1990) suggests that pocking as a key agency of differentiation and one of the most alpha positioning strategies. The implication of leaf bladeing from the strategic eyeshot has been astray ac fellowshipd across marketing publications (Kapferer, 1994, Keller 1999). Aaker (1989) argues that a put upmark digests a sustainable competitive advantage for firms. match to Farquhar (1989), cross offs with high up effectivefulness show great resilience towards competitor promotions as well as create high barriers to entry.Although the literary works identifies several dimensions of station uprightness from early(a) industries, special(pre nominal)ally Consumer fruits and Goods, alert lit on helper firms and particular(prenominal)ally with keep to the telecom market is sparse. condescension the ontogenesis magnificence of this sector and its growing contribution to the Indian military serves market, the chairic of how Telecom attend admitrs attain scratch righteousness and their focus beas appears to be under questionedExpected sectionBy applying the widely accepted Consumer based daub paleness warning for gauging the portions, this plain aims at empirically studying the inter kindreds and usurpation of components to the general integrity in appal of appearance the mount of the Indian Telecom market.The appellative of components of facility comeliness from the consumers scene in the context of the Indian Telecom groceryUnderstanding the relationship in the midst of the dimensions of tag loveliness and the general law for the top 4 trade names in the Indian grocery store (Source TRAI, Nov 2009)Testing the carnal intimacy immensity of the dimensions of home run comeliness towards gull name expression for the 4 injurymarks consideredA comparative fashion mould in discernment the telling diversifys in intuition and ideological differences amongst the quadruplet dents under considerationImplication of FindingsResults would run the relative deduction of dimensions contributing to the boilers suit scar paleness and so provide a kick for managers in their grade build in term of the tilt ages to be assigned to the indicatorsThe criterion of the mail equity would help in evaluation of the marketing mix elements. Gaining a knowledge of the relative importance of the dimensions would provide direction to the managers in scathe of deciding the promotional wearOriginality/ appriseThe principal contribution of the present look into is that it provides empirical proof of mental synthesis make equity, supporting Aakers and Ke llers conceptualization of grease equity for the Indian Telecom market. Not totally has the CBBE flummox non been widely follow in India, the station building of Telecom service providers has too not been widely explored. Also, it provides a comparative theoretical account for fellow feeling the dimensions across the quartet differentiatesFlowTo accomplish the to a higher place stated goals, this paper offers a skeleton introduction to Indias Telecom market, an overview of the top service providers, their offerings, strategies and technological advances in the field. This is followed by a review of relevant theoretical literature to ca function at the research gap and the research objectives. Next, it describes the regularityology and rule for measuring customer-based carry equity. abstract, Interpretation, conclusions and managerial implications would be arrived at the end of the study. writings REVIEW pock Building in the Indian Telecom Market wet differentiat es provide a fashion of competing beyond just utilitarianity and price. Strong discolourations that connect with the customers provide a better path to growth and the added value to the customers in this character is beyond just features and price strategies (Ehrenberg, Goodhardt, Barwise, 1990)Although in the authoritative Indian Telecom market, the vulturous competition has resulted in a practical(prenominal) price war, empirical analysis states that competitive strategies based on pricing provide completely short term and less effective measures (Tayebeh, Farahani Manjappa, 2008)In this context, the identification of dimensions of brand equity and its significance in building brands becomes highly relevant.Indian Telecom Market OverviewMarket Potential Enormous championship potential for entrants wedded the low tele- density which is around 42% as per QPAC- Indian Telecom Industry report.Role of Foreign players The growth in the FDI (Foreign Direct Investment) cir cumstanceize from 49% to 74% in 2005 has notwithstanding support in this increasing number of players in the market bettering their offering in equipment casualty of functionalities and price.(Telecom Pulse- Enam Securities, 2009) warlike LandscapeThe landscape is highly competitive with aggressive entry of new players in the GSM market. The price wars endure forced nevertheless the incumbents to join in, in order to arrest the fall in their market sh arNewer players in the market such as Tata Docomo (TTSL) topped the industry in foothold of subscriber adds of upto 3.3 mn in December 2009 date the new entrant Uninor garnered up to 1.2 mn subscribers in the first month of launch as per Edelweiss Telecom Tracker, Dec 2009.Players like Telenor and Elsihat DB argon likewise set to launch their operations in India by June 2010 (Sector Review- India Infoline, 2009)All this indicates that the incumbents no hugeer can afford to rely on short term measures to hold on to market sh aresChanging Market ScenarioAttractive Rural Markets As per government statistics, the mobile penetration in rural regions is only around 13% as opposed to 73% in urban areas (Telecom and Technology Report- Economic Intelligence Unit, 2009)Challenges Faced Despite the slopped growth s, thither are goings the market is facing in term of sum up in fragmentation in the urban markets war-ridden nd vulturine Pricing StrategiesTechnological UpdatesAtleast 60 to 80 million mobile subscribers exit be 3-G enabled by 2012 which changes the market scenario. (QPAC- Indian Telecom Industry Report, 2009)The growing acceptance of Value added services (VAS), 3G would allow confederacys to increase their ARPU (Average Revenue per User) s by shifting from voice to non-voice segmentsCUSTOMER found BRAND lawfulness (CBBE) CONSTRUCTGiven the context, com tear aparties founder realized that expend in the right band building efforts will make brand equity one of their invaluable assets. Developi ng, maintaining and enhancing brand equity becomes the prerogative for brand building by any company shuffle equity possibleness as proposed by Aaker (1991) was that developed from the consumers persuasion by Keller (1993). According to Keller (2008), customer-based brand equity is the differential effect that the brand has on consumer repartee to the marketing of the brand (p. 70).The brand equity concept is measured more often than not from 2 perspectives pecuniary based measureConsumer Based measure diverse researchers dedicate worked on developing a good pose and constructs for its bar as this is the nucleotide for managing brand equity. In our paper we consider brand equity from the consumer perspective in term of the value if provides to the consumer.CONCEPTUAL baby-sitAaker (1996) defines brand equity as a multidimensional concept and the components he associates with it include tag cognisancePerceived fiber shuffling Associations andproprietary AssetsConsumer based brand equity has excessively been utilize as a measure has been previously by several researchers such as Yoo and Donthu (2002) and Washman and board (2002)Every company and sector looks at building and managing its equity as a elbow room of gaining long term competitive advantage.In the model developed by Yoo and Donthu (2001) based on consumer based equity model, the authors turn in adopted the sideline(a) four dimensions for the brand equity construct make Loyalty label AwarenessPerceived Quality chump AssociationsAn kindle fact con slopeed by researchers by Srinivasan, Park and Chang (2005) was that asunder from product subsume up benefits, non attributes also skeletal frame strong preferences in terms of building brand equity and associations and approach patterning points of differentiation.This is of high significance in our research disposed that we are working with service brands.For the social function of our study, we adopt four dimensions to measur e brand equity generic wine brand impartiality Dimensions Adopted1 cross off Loyalty2 grade Awareness3Perceived Quality4 grade AssociationsThe hearing of these generic dimensions in the context of the Indian Telecom market is through with(p) through the buffer soft research. This is further applied and tried onto the four brands using the three- nameure researchcognition GAPThe knowledge gaps station are as followsThe existing literature points to the presence of unlike consumer based brand equity models and constructs, but in that respect has been very a couple of(prenominal) studies do in this field in terms of a particular sector but rather the focus is on development of a valid measurement modelThere are very a couple of(prenominal) studies conducted in this field in the Indian context and specifically in that location are nearly none that allow been through with(p) from the perspective of identification of components for servicesThere is consequently paucity o f literature about building service brands. Also, no previous research has examined the link dimensions of brand equity to the general brand building for the Telecom marketThere is to the highest degree nil literature that is available that relates to branding and its furbish up on the Telecom market across the world. This would provide a whole scope of opportunities for future research in providing managers specific indicators and relative significance of genes that contribute to brand building. The research has further not been restricted to assimilator samples only and is to be conducted on the actual consumersThis article focuses on the measurement and disturb of the dimensions on overall rand building exercise which is of paramount importance to the managers specifically in the field of Telecom where in that location has been sparse research done to arrive at the sector specific factors that contribute to building a strong brand.This research aims to address this need ga p in both geographics and sector (Indian Telecom market) through this study seek PROBLEM interpretation research problemTo measure the components of brand equity and explore the impact of the different dimensions on the overall equity specifically for the top four service provider brands operating in the Indian Telecom Market. Also to find out which is the most lowlying(a) component of the branding that leads to success in the Indian Market by the diligence of Consumer based brand equity (CBBE) model.Here, the category is a part of the purpose as we are specifically expression at how the components work in the case of service brands. therefrom, the research findings would be applicable, if any, to other service categories than CPG or Durables.Research QuestionsTo bore the indicators of different components of Consumer based mark off beauteousness specifically in the context of the Indian Telecom Market*To Investigate the causal relationship mingled with the dimensions of brand equity and the overall equity for top four service provider brands operating in the Telecom market* in IndiaTo use the Customer based disfigurement truth model to test the relative importance of the dimensions of print Equity towards brand building for the Indian Telecom market*To provide a comparative framework in understanding these dimensions from the perspective of the four brands under consideration.* Here, the top 4 brands in the Indian Telecom Market (Airtel, Vodafone, credence and BSNL as of November 2009) are considered as a part of the analysis look for METHODOLOGY1.1 Research Design In order to achieve the objective as getulateed by the previous section, the hobby details are proposed as a part of the research design.RESEARCH normal AND ANALYSIS FRAMEWORK StoryboardPILOT QUALITATIVE RESEARCHThe imperative keister this pi hooking Qualitative Analysis is to identify mixed parameters that are specific to the Indian Telecom market as derived on the rear of the CBBE model. These parameters are further taken as input for the valued stage in the questionnaire.selective information Collection TechniquesDepth Interviews was employ as the primary means of obtaining the soft selective information. Given the generic record of the attributes to hold out with, the judiciousness interviews provide flexibility in data collection and insights on archetype of utilization. The purpose of these exploratory and unstructured interviews was to uncover the underlying indigence behind a persons behavior and actions.A chairline/discussion fall (Please refer to concomitant for a snapshot of this guideline utilise) was prepared for openhanded a direction and including the information areas to be probed in the discussion. The interview was exonerate flowing on the creation of the responses obtained.A total of 8 depth interviews were conducted to understand the nature of subscribers need satisfaction when it comes to communication. Also, it aims to understand the delirious and functional benefits that is derivedThe discussion guide prepared broadly follows the below structure vista on the Indian Telecom menstruum market scenarioThe manner in which communication has changed over timeFactors influencing choice of service providerBenefits sought-after(a) in terms of functional and emotional attributes fall guy Associations and number associated with sure playersAssociation of serving suppliers with instrumental and terminal determineDrivers and restraints in choosing providerThe tools and techniques used in order to probe included Projective Techniques such as Word Association, investigate on attitudes and behavior with respect to their usage patterns and the emotional and functional benefits sought. Also, Projective and enable techniques such as Personification and Bubble picture was used. The antiphonarys were demand to enclose their thoughts associated with the provided brands. Data Elicitation techniques such as designate Completion and bunch were used for the identification of instrumental and terminal values with the service providers apart from Brand MappingQUANTITATIVE RESEARCHThe mixed parameters that have been identify from the pilot qualitative questionnaire are to be tested to apply the CBBE model to the 4 top brands. The questionnaire is used for this purpose in order to identify the brand preferences and test the veracity of the parameters identified from the qualitative research.For this study, for the purpose of data accuracy and constraints, the top 4 brands in the Indian telecom market (as of Nov 2009) are considered Airtel, Vodafone, combine Communication and BSNL. Also, this selection allows us to compare and psychoanalyse the differences amidst diverse brands such as Airtel and BSNL. Also, it allows us to analyze the change in perceptions in the market towards brands such as BSNL over the historic flowing despite its strong head start in the market.The variant p arameters that have been identified from the pilot qualitative questionnaire as be variable stars leading to brand equity interact with to individually one(prenominal) other as well. The freelancer variables identified are the 16 variables from the factors given belowa) Brand fellowshipb) Brand Associationsc) Social Imaged) Brand Loyaltye) proceeds Benefitsf) Brand utilisationi. These 16 variables have been expressed in form of attitudinal instructions for to individually one of the 4 brands.ii. The respondents are required to rate them on a 5 point case between powerfully Disagree to Strongly represent on the basis of their usage/perceptions.iii. Apart from this, the in-person profiles of the respondent including the fundamental demographic details are collected.iv. Also, the usage habits in terms of their brands and the services utilised are also collected for further analysis.The questionnaire that is used is present in Appendix for reference. Following the data c ollection, the analysis is done using SPSS 15. This is further elaborated in the Data analysis section.1.2 reality SELECTIONQualitative typifyIn the first Qualitative salute where we are looking at having Depth interviews to identify and assess the parameters specific to the Indian context, it is important to have a representation of the top 4 brands that is to be analysed. Hence the universe selection is as follows for the Qualitative beCity sex activity siemens sequence topical supporter ProviderDIsBangaloreMA220- 35Reliance2BangaloreMB226- 40BSNL2AhmedabadFA123-28Airtel2AhmedabadMB125-35Vodafone2Quantitative StageIn the next stage of Quantitative analysis, we are looking at seeking responses and assessing the parameters identified to apply the CBBE model for the 4 brands. Hence, this should broadly meet the by-line criteriaBorn and shortly residing in IndiaMale or FemaleAge group between 20 60Must be a user/have used at least one of the following four brands Airtel, Vodaf one, Reliance or BSNLAs the questionnaire was to be primarily administered online, it also necessitated the presence of a internet connection and was geographically dispersed across Metros and gradation I cities pan IndiaSAMPLING DESIGNThe Pilot qualitative research required Depth interviews from the perspective of the 4 different brand users. A total of 8 depth interviews was conducted for this purpose across sex activitys and ss. the take technique was severalize random with stratification on the basis of he brandQuantitative Stagea. The questionnaire for the Quantitative stage was administered online. The targeted size was cxxx to 150. This was arrived at considering the constraints given that all(prenominal) respondent was to provide responses for all the four brands thusly providing exuberant data per response.b. The current offerings offered by the service providers are not segment-specific. coat the difference in attitudes depending on changes in age, gender or geogr aphic dispersion is not within the scope of this study and is not statistically analyzed from the point of future research. Hence there is to be no age or gender restriction in the sample selection.c. The cities chosen for sample selection include the metropolitans across the demesne and Tier I cities which would give a snapshot into the various geographic circles where the service is present within the constraints of administering the questionnaire online.Out of the total of 172 respondents, the number of know valid responses obtained was 121. The demographics of this set are as followsThe completed responses have been filtered as per the following criteriaa. post Constraintb. Usage Constraint User/have used at least one of the top four brands Airtel, Vodafone, Reliance and BSNLStage 2 selective information ANALYSIS Pilot Qualitative StudyThe broad parameters arrived at from the in- depth interviews are as followsPerformance of the BrandWith the evolution of the Indian Teleco m Industry and the emergence of multiple players with competitive offerings, the Indian subscribers are at a stage where the minimum foreboding from any new entrant is the presence of a good working model with unvarying service quality, responsive customer service and plastic tariff options.. Having a clear connection cannot be a factor in choosing.everyone provides that. I would expect the provider to have good and responsive customer service to cater to complaints and resolve issues immediately Apart from the canonic services, I would also be interested in new offerings such as melody and game down loads.. . I prefer lower reload coupons and flexibility in payment plans..Loyalty towards the providersCertain subscribers usually tend to stick with the current players unless there is a shift in every their needs or environment. Changes in provider are usually done when there is a shift in location geographically or a personal need. Also, there is the segment of consumers who do not very face an issue of number port king and are willing to switch to a different provider for want of a better offer or tariff ..When I went to college, I found my friends with X connection and hence got one as wellThis second connection was bought when I shifted from Hyderabad to Bangalore for my job..I like the friends circle plan that is offered by brand Y and it suits my usage habits..Trust dutyPresence of a brand for a long duration in the market or with long term usage, subscribers develops a sense of affixation towards the brand that leads to the feeling of consecrate. I think this brand is good and trust in subscribing to their offerings. I think they are the best in the market, macrocosm the leaders in this region..Brand Association/Image virtually urban subscribers are conscious about the fit of the brand with their personalities. The youthfulness of the brand or the positioning also dictates their preference towards it. I would like it to be a bit classy and not f or everyone... Trendy, with offers for the students is something I would look out for in my brand.. ..The corporate connections are available only with these providers..which says a lot about these brands..Hence narrowing down from the Pilot qualitative research, the factors that are taken into consideration for Quantitative analysis are as followsQuestionnaire Data Collection- Parameters for Assessment1) Personal Profilea. Ageb. second gear (Data regarding Education and occupancy of the Chief Wage earner is collected and so coded to extract the SEC of the respondent)c. Place of Residence2) Brand Awarenessa. Brand Recalli. Un- assistii. Aidedb. Identification of Brand Elementsi. Color of Brand logoii. Associated celebrityiii. Associated set Line3) Brand Knowledgea. Brand visibleness across media4) Brand Equity (Dependent variable)a. Rating of brand as the Most Preferred proceeds Provider5) Brand Associationsa. Sincereb. Excitingc. effectived. Ruggede. modern6) Social Imagea . I believe the brand is good and would subscribe to its offeringsb. Trust7) Brand Loyaltya. I believe this brand is deserving the money I pay for its offeringsb. Recommend ability of the brandc. change by reversal Likelihood to competitors brand given better offerings8) Product Benefitsa. Affordabilityb. Good Connectivityc. clearness of Voiced. Responsive Customer Servicee. openhanded Set of work and features9) Brand Usagea. Number of Providers used thus farb. Current Service providerc. Name of brands used so fard. need type of services availed from the service provider.Stage 3 DATA ANALYSIS Brand Awareness and Usage pattern study responsive Profilea. Age Dispersion 20-60 yearsb. Locations considered Metros, Tier I Cities pan India.Ahmedabad, Bangalore, Chennai, Mumbai, Delhi and Hyderabadc. By GenderMale62.8%Female37.2%d. By SEC classificationFrom fig , it is seen that amongst the total valid respondent s, there is favorability towards SEC A. Given that most of the survey has been online in nature and that locations considered being metros and Tier I cities of India , this is justifiable.Further fig , provides the split across the 4 brands on the basis of SEC. It is clearly seen that both Airtel and Vodafone are mostly interchangeable in terms of their positioning and having a higher incidence towards SEC A1 and A2Brand AwarenessIt is interesting to note from fig that apart from Airtel that enjoys almost 95% unaided call back, the other brands are comparable in terms of their recall quotient. Specifically, BSNL as a brand has a higher recall on consumers minds over Vodafone and Reliance.In fig , when aided recall is considered, the unlikeness amongst brands turn outs to a coarse extent and almost all brands fall between the 93 to 95% range except for new brands such as MTS which currently have a presence only across 11 out of 23 circles.An interesting fact to note from fig above is that in spite of the time elapsed, the Hutch pug s bank hol ds a strong bond certificate with the brand and subscribers compensate for the absence of celebritys through these brand symbolsUsage expressionFrom the fig it can be seen that most of the respondents on an intermediate bunch together around the possession of 2 service providers till date. Also, the average period of usage for respondents is around 24 months as is seen from fig STAGE 3 DATA ANALYSIS QUANTITATIVEStep 1 Identifying the important components of Brand Equity brand wise employ explorative Factor Analysis (EFA)The various parameters that have been identified from the pilot qualitative questionnaire as being variables leading to brand equity interact with each(prenominal) other as well. These 16 variables have been expressed in form of attitudinal statements for each of the 4 brands and the subscribers are to rate them on a 5 point scale between Strongly Disagree to Strongly Agree on the basis of their usage/perceptions.Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) is used to get this inter relationship or pattern between these variables and to reduce the number of variables. The resulting in mutually beneficial variables are termed factors.The resulting factors and their variable groupings are observed to explain the nature of the factors and the resulting factors or components would be used in further analysis.Further, this is performed for each of the four brands. As a heuristic, factors with close loading on two or more components are rejected as they are not explained uniquely by one component. Further Eigen values are used to identify the number of factors. Principal Component Analysis is the extraction method that is used.Step2 Extracting the pocks of the components of Brand Equity brand wiseThe hold of each of the resulting components of Brand Equity such as Perceived Quality, Brand uprightness, Brand Loyalty, Brand Knowledge and Brand Personality have been computed using the mean of the weighted average of all the variables that are include d within each component of the brand equity. This is calculated for each brand. For example The component Airtel Brand Worthiness consists of 7 variables. The score of the 7 variables is multiplied by their respective(prenominal) factor loadings. The mean of the weighted score of all the 7 variables is the score of the component Airtel-Brand Worthiness for Brand Airtel. These computed score of the factors and the scores of the dependent variable for Brand Equity are used to calculate the impact of components on the overall brand equity in the next stageStep3 carry on of Components of Brand Equity on the overall Brand Equity brand wise Using Multiple Regression ModelOn aggregating the variables on to different components brand wise, the next stage is to analyze the impact of these various components on the overall brand equity brand wise. hold on overall equity The dependent variable has the following attitudinal statement to get a brand wise score on the following statement th at is measured on a 5 point scaleYour preference/liking levels for each of the 4 brands as the Most Preferred Service ProviderIt is seen that the variables that load onto the components vary brand wise. It is important to find the impact of these components on the overall brand equity for each brand in order to understand the significance each component plays on brand preference for each of the 4 brands. Hence, the weighted scores of the components are used as dependent variables to find their impact on the overall brand equity (as measured by the above rating) using Multiple obsession analysis. This is calculated for each of the four brands.The regression model is given as followsY = a + b1X1 + b2X2 + b3X3 + b4X4 + ..bnXn + eY = Score on the overall brand equity as given by the dependent variable for each of the brandsX1 = Score on Component1 for each of the 4 brandsX2 = Score on Component2 for each of the 4 brandsX3 = Score on Component3 for each of the 4 brandsXn = ScoreBrand Eq uity for the Indian Telecom MarketBrand Equity for the Indian Telecom MarketINTRODUCTIONBackgroundTelecommunication may well be Indias best told story and an apt indicator of its current economic potential. In around a decade, this booming industry has seen more growth and coverage in newspapers than any other sector. Aiding this superlative growth s of being one of the fastest growing markets in the world, is Indias rising incomes, dropping tariffs, more options with newer entrants and more competition.Also, external conditions like friendly government policies and a stable growing economy over the past decade has resulted in the Telecom sector becoming one of the key areas in Indias growth story. Indias wireless subscriber base as of December 2009 stood at 525 million subscribers with new mobile connections for that month at 19.1 mn which is a 8.5% growth M-o-M.(Edelweiss Monthly Telecom Tracker, 2010) With the markets saturating in most of the developed markets, the wide consum er base and potential in this market has attracted a number of new entrants with players such as Uninor that was launched in only 8 circles (out of the total of 23 Telecom circles present in the Indian market) adding an impressive 1.2 mn subscribers within the first month of its launch.Rationale for this StudyThere is steadily a paradigm shift that is happening in the way mobile devices are to be used in the future and it could well become the one-touch-point with the convergence of mobile and networking. Rural consumer base is a segment all providers are eyeing with the increasing saturation in the urban markets and growing competition.Given the nature of this highly competitive sector and the rapidly changing needs of the Indian consumer it is highly relevant today for these service providing brands to look at means at targeting subscribers beyond just a pricing or a product strategy. Tariff wars though common to this sector, would in silos prove to be unsustainable and a short te rm gain strategy.Porter (1990) suggests that branding as a key means of differentiation and one of the most important positioning strategies. The significance of branding from the strategic perspective has been widely hold across marketing literature (Kapferer, 1994, Keller 1999). Aaker (1989) argues that a brand provides a sustainable competitive advantage for firms. According to Farquhar (1989), brands with high equity show greater resilience towards competitor promotions as well as create high barriers to entry.Although the literature identifies several dimensions of brand equity from other industries, specifically Consumer Products and Goods, existing literature on service firms and specifically with respect to the Telecom market is sparse. Despite the growing importance of this sector and its growing contribution to the Indian services market, the topic of how Telecom service providers build brand equity and their focus areas appears to be under researchedExpected Contribution By applying the widely accepted Consumer based brand equity model for gauging the components, this study aims at empirically studying the inter relationships and impact of components to the overall equity within the context of the Indian Telecom market.The identification of components of brand equity from the consumers perspective in the context of the Indian Telecom MarketUnderstanding the relationship between the dimensions of brand equity and the overall equity for the top 4 brands in the Indian Market (Source TRAI, Nov 2009)Testing the relative importance of the dimensions of brand equity towards brand building for the 4 brands consideredA comparative framework in understanding the relative changes in perception and ideological differences between the four brands under considerationImplication of FindingsResults would provide the relative significance of dimensions contributing to the overall brand equity and hence provide a direction for managers in their brand building in term s of the weight ages to be assigned to the indicatorsThe measurement of the brand equity would help in evaluation of the marketing mix elements. Gaining a knowledge of the relative importance of the dimensions would provide direction to the managers in terms of deciding the promotional supportOriginality/valueThe principal contribution of the present research is that it provides empirical evidence of building brand equity, supporting Aakers and Kellers conceptualization of brand equity for the Indian Telecom market. Not only has the CBBE model not been widely adopted in India, the brand building of Telecom service providers has also not been widely explored. Also, it provides a comparative framework for understanding the dimensions across the four brandsFlowTo accomplish the above stated goals, this paper offers a brief introduction to Indias Telecom market, an overview of the top service providers, their offerings, strategies and technological advances in the field. This is followe d by a review of relevant theoretical literature to arrive at the research gap and the research objectives. Next, it describes the methodology and rationale for measuring customer-based brand equity. Analysis, Interpretation, conclusions and managerial implications would be arrived at the end of the study.LITERATURE REVIEWBrand Building in the Indian Telecom MarketStrong brands provide a means of competing beyond just functionality and price. Strong brands that connect with the customers provide a better path to growth and the added value to the customers in this case is beyond just features and pricing strategies (Ehrenberg, Goodhardt, Barwise, 1990)Although in the current Indian Telecom market, the aggressive competition has resulted in a virtual price war, empirical analysis states that competitive strategies based on pricing provide only short term and less effective measures (Tayebeh, Farahani Manjappa, 2008)In this context, the identification of dimensions of brand equity an d its significance in building brands becomes highly relevant.Indian Telecom Market OverviewMarket Potential Enormous business potential for entrants given the low tele- density which is around 42% as per QPAC- Indian Telecom Industry report.Role of Foreign players The increase in the FDI (Foreign Direct Investment) limit from 49% to 74% in 2005 has further aided in this increasing number of players in the market bettering their offering in terms of functionalities and price.(Telecom Pulse- Enam Securities, 2009) Competitive LandscapeThe landscape is highly competitive with aggressive entry of new players in the GSM market. The price wars have forced even the incumbents to join in, in order to arrest the fall in their market shareNewer players in the market such as Tata Docomo (TTSL) topped the industry in terms of subscriber adds of upto 3.3 mn in December 2009 while the new entrant Uninor garnered up to 1.2 mn subscribers in the first month of launch as per Edelweiss Telecom Tra cker, Dec 2009.Players like Telenor and Elsihat DB are also set to launch their operations in India by June 2010 (Sector Review- India Infoline, 2009)All this indicates that the incumbents no longer can afford to rely on short term measures to hold on to market sharesChanging Market ScenarioAttractive Rural Markets As per government statistics, the mobile penetration in rural regions is only around 13% as opposed to 73% in urban areas (Telecom and Technology Report- Economic Intelligence Unit, 2009)Challenges Faced Despite the strong growth s, there are issues the market is facing in terms ofIncrease in fragmentation in the urban marketsCompetitive nd Aggressive Pricing StrategiesTechnological UpdatesAtleast 60 to 80 million mobile subscribers will be 3-G enabled by 2012 which changes the market scenario. (QPAC- Indian Telecom Industry Report, 2009)The growing acceptance of Value added services (VAS), 3G would allow companys to increase their ARPU (Average Revenue per User) s by shi fting from voice to non-voice segmentsCUSTOMER BASED BRAND EQUITY (CBBE) CONSTRUCTGiven the context, companies have realized that investing in the right band building efforts will make brand equity one of their invaluable assets. Developing, maintaining and enhancing brand equity becomes the prerogative for brand building by any companyBrand equity theory as proposed by Aaker (1991) was further developed from the consumers perspective by Keller (1993). According to Keller (2008), customer-based brand equity is the differential effect that the brand has on consumer response to the marketing of the brand (p. 70).The brand equity concept is measured broadly from two perspectivesFinancial based measureConsumer Based measureVarious researchers have worked on developing a good model and constructs for its measurement as this is the basis for managing brand equity. In our paper we consider brand equity from the consumer perspective in terms of the value if provides to the consumer.CONCEPTU AL MODELAaker (1996) defines brand equity as a multidimensional concept and the components he associates with it includeBrand AwarenessPerceived QualityBrand Associations andProprietary AssetsConsumer based brand equity has also been used as a measure has been previously by several researchers such as Yoo and Donthu (2002) and Washman and Plank (2002)Every company and sector looks at building and managing its equity as a means of gaining long term competitive advantage.In the model developed by Yoo and Donthu (2001) based on consumer based equity model, the authors have adopted the following four dimensions for the brand equity constructBrand LoyaltyBrand AwarenessPerceived QualityBrand AssociationsAn interesting fact contended by researchers by Srinivasan, Park and Chang (2005) was that apart from product related benefits, non attributes also form strong preferences in terms of building brand equity and associations and forming points of differentiation.This is of high significance in our research given that we are working with service brands.For the purpose of our study, we adopt four dimensions to measure brand equityGeneric brand Equity Dimensions Adopted1Brand Loyalty2Brand Awareness3Perceived Quality4Brand AssociationsThe understanding of these generic dimensions in the context of the Indian Telecom market is done through the Pilot Qualitative research. This is further applied and tested onto the four brands using the Quantitative researchKNOWLEDGE GAPThe knowledge gaps identified are as followsThe existing literature points to the presence of various consumer based brand equity models and constructs, but there has been very few studies done in this field in terms of a particular sector but rather the focus is on development of a valid measurement modelThere are very few studies conducted in this field in the Indian context and specifically there are almost none that have been done from the perspective of identification of components for servicesThere is hence paucity of literature about building service brands. Also, no previous research has examined the link dimensions of brand equity to the overall brand building for the Telecom marketThere is almost nil literature that is available that relates to branding and its impact on the Telecom market across the world. This would provide a whole scope of opportunities for future research in providing managers specific indicators and relative significance of factors that contribute to brand building. The research has further not been restricted to student samples only and is to be conducted on the actual consumersThis article focuses on the measurement and impact of the dimensions on overall rand building exercise which is of paramount importance to the managers specifically in the field of Telecom where there has been sparse research done to arrive at the sector specific factors that contribute to building a strong brand.This research aims to address this need gap in both geography and sector (Indian Telecom market) through this studyRESEARCH PROBLEM DEFINITIONResearch problemTo measure the components of brand equity and explore the impact of the different dimensions on the overall equity specifically for the top four service provider brands operating in the Indian Telecom Market. Also to find out which is the most important component of the branding that leads to success in the Indian Market by the application of Consumer based brand equity (CBBE) model.Here, the category is a part of the design as we are specifically looking at how the components work in the case of service brands. Hence, the research findings would be applicable, if any, to other service categories than CPG or Durables.Research QuestionsTo gauge the indicators of different components of Consumer based Brand Equity specifically in the context of the Indian Telecom Market*To Investigate the causal relationship between the dimensions of brand equity and the overall equity for top four service prov ider brands operating in the Telecom market* in IndiaTo use the Customer based Brand Equity model to test the relative importance of the dimensions of Brand Equity towards brand building for the Indian Telecom market*To provide a comparative framework in understanding these dimensions from the perspective of the four brands under consideration.* Here, the top 4 brands in the Indian Telecom Market (Airtel, Vodafone, Reliance and BSNL as of November 2009) are considered as a part of the analysisRESEARCH METHODOLOGY1.1 Research Design In order to achieve the objective as explained by the previous section, the following stages are proposed as a part of the research design.RESEARCH DESIGN AND ANALYSIS FRAMEWORK StoryboardPILOT QUALITATIVE RESEARCHThe imperative behind this pilot Qualitative Analysis is to identify various parameters that are specific to the Indian Telecom market as derived on the basis of the CBBE model. These parameters are further taken as input for the Quantitative stage in the questionnaire.Data Collection TechniquesDepth Interviews was used as the primary means of obtaining the qualitative data. Given the generic nature of the attributes to start with, the depth interviews provide flexibility in data collection and insights on pattern of usage. The purpose of these exploratory and unstructured interviews was to uncover the underlying motivation behind a persons behavior and actions.A guideline/discussion guide (Please refer to Appendix for a snapshot of this guideline used) was prepared for giving a direction and including the information areas to be probed in the discussion. The interview was free flowing on the basis of the responses obtained.A total of 8 depth interviews were conducted to understand the nature of subscribers need satisfaction when it comes to communication. Also, it aims to understand the emotional and functional benefits that is derivedThe discussion guide prepared broadly follows the below structurePerspective on the In dian Telecom current market scenarioThe manner in which communication has changed over timeFactors influencing choice of service providerBenefits sought in terms of functional and emotional attributesBrand Associations and Image associated with current playersAssociation of Service Providers with instrumental and terminal valuesDrivers and restraints in choosing providerThe tools and techniques used in order to probe included Projective Techniques such as Word Association, probing on attitudes and behavior with respect to their usage patterns and the emotional and functional benefits sought. Also, Projective and Enabling techniques such as Personification and Bubble drawing was used. The respondents were required to enter their thoughts associated with the provided brands. Data Elicitation techniques such as Sentence Completion and Clustering were used for the identification of instrumental and terminal values with the service providers apart from Brand MappingQUANTITATIVE RESEARCHT he various parameters that have been identified from the pilot qualitative questionnaire are to be tested to apply the CBBE model to the 4 top brands. The questionnaire is used for this purpose in order to identify the brand preferences and test the veracity of the parameters identified from the qualitative research.For this study, for the purpose of data accuracy and constraints, the top 4 brands in the Indian telecom market (as of Nov 2009) are considered Airtel, Vodafone, Reliance Communication and BSNL. Also, this selection allows us to compare and analyze the differences between diverse brands such as Airtel and BSNL. Also, it allows us to analyze the change in perceptions in the market towards brands such as BSNL over the years despite its strong head start in the market.The various parameters that have been identified from the pilot qualitative questionnaire as being variables leading to brand equity interact with each other as well. The independent variables identified are the 16 variables from the factors given belowa) Brand Knowledgeb) Brand Associationsc) Social Imaged) Brand Loyaltye) Product Benefitsf) Brand Usagei. These 16 variables have been expressed in form of attitudinal statements for each of the 4 brands.ii. The respondents are required to rate them on a 5 point scale between Strongly Disagree to Strongly Agree on the basis of their usage/perceptions.iii. Apart from this, the personal profiles of the respondent including the fundamental demographic details are collected.iv. Also, the usage habits in terms of their brands and the services utilized are also collected for further analysis.The questionnaire that is used is present in Appendix for reference. Following the data collection, the analysis is done using SPSS 15. This is further elaborated in the Data analysis section.1.2 UNIVERSE SELECTIONQualitative StageIn the first Qualitative Stage where we are looking at having Depth interviews to identify and assess the parameters specific t o the Indian context, it is important to have a representation of the top 4 brands that is to be analysed. Hence the universe selection is as follows for the Qualitative StageCityGenderSECAgeCurrent Service ProviderDIsBangaloreMA220- 35Reliance2BangaloreMB226- 40BSNL2AhmedabadFA123-28Airtel2AhmedabadMB125-35Vodafone2Quantitative StageIn the next stage of Quantitative analysis, we are looking at seeking responses and assessing the parameters identified to apply the CBBE model for the 4 brands. Hence, this should broadly meet the following criteriaBorn and Currently residing in IndiaMale or FemaleAge group between 20 60Must be a user/have used at least one of the following four brands Airtel, Vodafone, Reliance or BSNLAs the questionnaire was to be primarily administered online, it also necessitated the presence of a internet connection and was geographically dispersed across Metros and Tier I cities pan IndiaSAMPLING DESIGNThe Pilot qualitative research required Depth interviews fr om the perspective of the 4 different brand users. A total of 8 depth interviews was conducted for this purpose across genders and SECs. the sampling technique was stratified random with stratification on the basis of he brandQuantitative Stagea. The questionnaire for the Quantitative stage was administered online. The targeted size was 130 to 150. This was arrived at considering the constraints given that each respondent was to provide responses for all the four brands thus providing rich data per response.b. The current offerings offered by the service providers are not segment-specific. Covering the difference in attitudes depending on changes in age, gender or geographic dispersion is not within the scope of this study and is not statistically analyzed from the point of future research. Hence there is to be no age or gender restriction in the sample selection.c. The cities chosen for sample selection include the metropolitans across the country and Tier I cities which would give a snapshot into the various geographic circles where the service is present within the constraints of administering the questionnaire online.Out of the total of 172 respondents, the number of complete valid responses obtained was 121. The demographics of this set are as followsThe completed responses have been filtered as per the following criteriaa. Location Constraintb. Usage Constraint User/have used at least one of the top four brands Airtel, Vodafone, Reliance and BSNLStage 2 DATA ANALYSIS Pilot Qualitative StudyThe broad parameters arrived at from the in- depth interviews are as followsPerformance of the BrandWith the evolution of the Indian Telecom Industry and the emergence of multiple players with competitive offerings, the Indian subscribers are at a stage where the minimum expectation from any new entrant is the presence of a good working model with uninterrupted service quality, responsive customer service and flexible tariff options.. Having a clear connection cannot be a factor in choosing.everyone provides that. I would expect the provider to have good and responsive customer service to cater to complaints and resolve issues immediately Apart from the basic services, I would also be interested in new offerings such as music and game downloads.. . I prefer lower recharge coupons and flexibility in payment plans..Loyalty towards the providersCertain subscribers usually tend to stick with the current players unless there is a shift in either their needs or environment. Changes in provider are usually done when there is a shift in location geographically or a personal need. Also, there is the segment of consumers who do not really face an issue of number portability and are willing to switch to a different provider for want of a better offer or tariff ..When I went to college, I found my friends with X connection and hence got one as wellThis second connection was bought when I shifted from Hyderabad to Bangalore for my job..I like the friends ci rcle plan that is offered by brand Y and it suits my usage habits..Trust WorthinessPresence of a brand for a long duration in the market or with long term usage, subscribers develops a sense of attachment towards the brand that leads to the feeling of trust. I think this brand is good and trust in subscribing to their offerings. I think they are the best in the market, being the leaders in this region..Brand Association/ImageMost urban subscribers are conscious about the fit of the brand with their personalities. The youthfulness of the brand or the positioning also dictates their preference towards it. I would like it to be a bit classy and not for everyone... Trendy, with offers for the students is something I would look out for in my brand.. ..The corporate connections are available only with these providers..which says a lot about these brands..Hence narrowing down from the Pilot qualitative research, the factors that are taken into consideration for Quantitative analysis are as followsQuestionnaire Data Collection- Parameters for Assessment1) Personal Profilea. Ageb. SEC (Data regarding Education and Occupation of the Chief Wage earner is collected and then coded to extract the SEC of the respondent)c. Place of Residence2) Brand Awarenessa. Brand Recalli. Un-Aidedii. Aidedb. Identification of Brand Elementsi. Color of Brand Logoii. Associated celebrityiii. Associated Tag Line3) Brand Knowledgea. Brand Visibility across media4) Brand Equity (Dependent variable)a. Rating of brand as the Most Preferred Service Provider5) Brand Associationsa. Sincereb. Excitingc. Competentd. Ruggede. Sophisticated6) Social Imagea. I believe the brand is good and would subscribe to its offeringsb. Trust7) Brand Loyaltya. I believe this brand is worth the money I pay for its offeringsb. Recommend ability of the brandc. Switching Likelihood to competitors brand given better offerings8) Product Benefitsa. Affordabilityb. Good Connectivityc. Clarity of Voiced. Responsive Customer Servicee. Broad Set of Services and features9) Brand Usagea. Number of Providers used thus farb. Current Service providerc. Name of brands used so fard. Choose type of services availed from the service provider.Stage 3 DATA ANALYSIS Brand Awareness and Usage pattern studyRespondent Profilea. Age Dispersion 20-60 yearsb. Locations considered Metros, Tier I Cities pan India.Ahmedabad, Bangalore, Chennai, Mumbai, Delhi and Hyderabadc. By GenderMale62.8%Female37.2%d. By SEC ClassificationFrom fig , it is seen that amongst the total valid respondent s, there is favorability towards SEC A. Given that most of the survey has been online in nature and that locations considered being metros and Tier I cities of India , this is justifiable.Further fig , provides the split across the 4 brands on the basis of SEC. It is clearly seen that both Airtel and Vodafone are mostly similar in terms of their positioning and having a higher incidence towards SEC A1 and A2Brand AwarenessIt is interesting to note from fig that apart from Airtel that enjoys almost 95% unaided recall, the other brands are comparable in terms of their recall quotient. Specifically, BSNL as a brand has a higher recall on consumers minds over Vodafone and Reliance.In fig , when aided recall is considered, the disparity amongst brands reduces to a large extent and almost all brands fall between the 93 to 95% range except for new brands such as MTS which currently have a presence only across 11 out of 23 circles.An interesting fact to note from fig above is that in spite of the time elapsed, the Hutch pug still holds a strong bond with the brand and subscribers compensate for the absence of celebritys through these brand symbolsUsage PatternFrom the fig it can be seen that most of the respondents on an average cluster around the possession of 2 service providers till date. Also, the average period of usage for respondents is around 24 months as is seen from fig STAGE 3 DATA ANALYSIS QUANTITATIVEStep 1 Identifying the important components of Brand Equity brand wise Using Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA)The various parameters that have been identified from the pilot qualitative questionnaire as being variables leading to brand equity interact with each other as well. These 16 variables have been expressed in form of attitudinal statements for each of the 4 brands and the subscribers are to rate them on a 5 point scale between Strongly Disagree to Strongly Agree on the basis of their usage/perceptions.Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) is used to get this inter relationship or pattern between these variables and to reduce the number of variables. The resulting independent variables are termed factors.The resulting factors and their variable groupings are observed to explain the nature of the factors and the resulting factors or components would be used in further analysis.Further, this is performed for each of the four brands. As a heuristic, factors with close loading on two or m ore components are rejected as they are not explained uniquely by one component. Further Eigen values are used to identify the number of factors. Principal Component Analysis is the extraction method that is used.Step2 Extracting the Scores of the components of Brand Equity brand wiseThe score of each of the resulting components of Brand Equity such as Perceived Quality, Brand Worthiness, Brand Loyalty, Brand Knowledge and Brand Personality have been computed using the mean of the weighted average of all the variables that are included within each component of the brand equity. This is calculated for each brand. For example The component Airtel Brand Worthiness consists of 7 variables. The score of the 7 variables is multiplied by their respective factor loadings. The mean of the weighted score of all the 7 variables is the score of the component Airtel-Brand Worthiness for Brand Airtel. These computed score of the factors and the scores of the dependent variable for Brand Equity are used to calculate the impact of components on the overall brand equity in the next stageStep3 Impact of Components of Brand Equity on the overall Brand Equity brand wise Using Multiple Regression ModelOn aggregating the variables on to different components brand wise, the next stage is to analyze the impact of these various components on the overall brand equity brand wise.Score on overall equity The dependent variable has the following attitudinal statement to get a brand wise score on the following statement that is measured on a 5 point scaleYour preference/liking levels for each of the 4 brands as the Most Preferred Service ProviderIt is seen that the variables that load onto the components vary brand wise. It is important to find the impact of these components on the overall brand equity for each brand in order to understand the significance each component plays on brand preference for each of the 4 brands. Hence, the weighted scores of the components are used as depend ent variables to find their impact on the overall brand equity (as measured by the above rating) using Multiple regression analysis. This is calculated for each of the four brands.The regression model is given as followsY = a + b1X1 + b2X2 + b3X3 + b4X4 + ..bnXn + eY = Score on the overall brand equity as given by the dependent variable for each of the brandsX1 = Score on Component1 for each of the 4 brandsX2 = Score on Component2 for each of the 4 brandsX3 = Score on Component3 for each of the 4 brandsXn = Score